A young woman vlogging indoors using a smartphone, tripod, and ring light setup.
Photo by Kampus Production on Pexels

Reviews

Part of UGC marketplace review method: ten evidence checks for one UK commission

UGC marketplaces in England: what providers must prove

UGC marketplaces in England: the advertising, data and labelling rules a provider must prove it follows, from CAP Code rule 2.1 to PECR and the CPRs.

UGC marketplaces and creator services can look polished and still leave you without the one thing that matters when a complaint or an advertising regulator arrives: evidence that the provider followed the UK rules for paid creator content. This article sets out what a provider in England must prove — the advertising code, the consumer law behind it, the electronic marketing rules, the labelling guidance and the copyright paperwork — and the checks that show the proof exists.

The standard is not a matter of taste. Each item below has a name, a rule number where one exists, and an authority that enforces it, so you can ask for a specific record instead of a general assurance. Keep that evidence with the same file as the budget template you use for the commission.

What a provider must prove before you commission it

A UGC provider's work is not only sourcing creators, briefing them and delivering an asset. It must also be able to show that the resulting ads are identifiable as ads, that any direct marketing it runs is lawful, that the claim in the asset can be substantiated, and that the rights in the footage, music and likeness are cleared in writing.

At the start, ask for:

  • the registered company name and company number behind the trading name, checkable on the Companies House register;
  • the exact service and edition, its UK availability, and the date of the terms you are offered;
  • the disclosure plan for every assethow each post, video or image will be labelled as advertising;
  • the written assignment or licence covering copyright, performance and likeness;
  • the assessment covering the Privacy and Electronic Communications Regulations (PECR) and data protection for each route used to contact creators or audiences;
  • the named person inside the provider who owns compliance.

A provider that cannot produce these records is not necessarily dishonest; it simply has not shown that the commission is safe to run under UK rules.

Advertising: CAP Code rule 2.1 and the ASA

The UK Code of Non-broadcast Advertising and Direct and Promotional Marketing — the CAP Code — applies to ads in all non-broadcast media, including digital platforms, and requires that marketing communications must be "obviously identifiable" as such under rule 2.1. The same account records that this requirement is underpinned by the Consumer Protection from Unfair Trading Regulations 2008. CAP Code rule 2.1

In practice a paid creator post that reads like an ordinary recommendation, with no label, fails the code and the consumer protection law behind it. The Advertising Standards Authority enforces the CAP Code, including the specific rules that protect children from advertising, as the ICO's direct marketing guidance itself notes. ICO direct marketing planning guidance

Ask a provider to show the exact label wording it will use, where the label will sit in the asset, and how the label survives when the creator reposts or edits the clip.

Data and electronic marketing: PECR, the ICO and the UK GDPR

The rules around electronic marketing are known as the Privacy and Electronic Communications Regulations (PECR). Live telephone marketing calls must comply with the electronic marketing rules in the Privacy and Electronic Communications Regulations 2003 (as amended), as well as with data protection laws. ICO marketing and data protection guidance

Where a provider handles creator or audience personal data, the UK GDPR and the Data Protection Act 2018 apply alongside PECR, and the Information Commissioner's Office regulates both. A provider should be able to name the lawful basis for each contact route, hold a record of consent or of its legitimate interests assessment, and show how correction, objection and deletion requests are handled.

Ask separately about children. If a service is likely to be accessed by children, the ICO's Age Appropriate Design Code sets standards for how it must be designed, and a provider working with young creators should be able to explain how that code applies.

Labelling paid content: CAP and CMA guidance for creators

The Committee of Advertising Practice (CAP) and the Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) publish guidance on how to label ads correctly. As the GOV.UK guidance for content creators puts it, that CAP and CMA guide explains how to comply with consumer protection law and the Advertising Codes enforced by the ASA. GOV.UK content creator endorsements guidance

The guidance is written for creators, but applying it is the provider's job. Ask which label each asset will carry, whether it appears in the first visible frame or line, and whether the provider keeps the disclosure decision on file next to the claim evidence and the final render.

Copyright: rights must be assigned in writing

Copyright in the footage, the edit and the music, and the performer's rights in the performance, do not move to you because you paid an invoice. Under the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 an assignment of copyright must be in writing and signed by or on behalf of the assignor. A licence can work instead, but it must state exactly what is licensed.

So ask for the signed assignment or licence, and check that it covers the channels, territory and term you need, plus the creator's likeness and any music used. Where a provider cannot produce that paperwork, you are buying an asset you may not be able to publish. The same discipline runs through the commercial contracts in England you agree alongside it.

A provider evidence checklist

Use this list with any UGC marketplace or creator service:

  • Registered company name and number checked on the Companies House register.
  • Exact UK service, edition and dated terms of service.
  • Disclosure plan and label wording for each asset, matching CAP Code rule 2.1.
  • Written, signed assignment or licence under the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988.
  • PECR and data protection assessment for every contact route, with deletion and correction routes.
  • Named compliance owner and the claim substantiation held for the asset.
  • Exit terms and a usable export of your own records.

File what you find next to your tools and data sources record and the wider costs and budget guide for the commission.

Common questions

Which rule makes a paid creator post identifiable as an ad?
CAP Code rule 2.1: marketing communications must be obviously identifiable as such, and the requirement is underpinned by the Consumer Protection from Unfair Trading Regulations 2008. The Advertising Standards Authority enforces the code.
Do UGC providers have to follow PECR?
Yes. Live telephone marketing calls must comply with the electronic marketing rules in the Privacy and Electronic Communications Regulations 2003 (as amended) as well as data protection laws, and the same rules cover electronic marketing more broadly. The ICO regulates this area.
What proves that the provider has cleared the rights?
A written assignment signed by or on behalf of the assignor, or a licence setting out the channels, territory and term, as required by the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988. Payment on its own is not a transfer of copyright.
Where can I check the company behind the provider?
On the Companies House register, using the registered name or company number. The register shows filed particulars only; it says nothing about service quality or suitability.

More in Reviews